A controversial scene at the last moment of last night, At the last moment between SIPG and Chongqing, Shi Ke made a grab and Feng Jin fell to the ground in the penalty area. After the referee Li Haixin communicated with the video referee Zhang Lei, he determined that there was no foul or penalty. Through slow motion, the penalty should be based on Shi Ke's kick. People usually know that kicking the ball from behind is mostly foul, but Feng Jin did not completely control the ball. When Shi Ke stretched his foot from behind, Feng Jin had already stretched his left foot to the front of the ball and might be ready to pull the ball behind him. At this moment, the ball exposed the body's control range, and Shi Ke also steals from behind at this time. Many people said that it was Zhang Lei again, and SIPG’s VAR actually hammered the scene. In fact, I personally feel that it is not a big problem if this ball does not blow a penalty.
昨晚最后一刻有争议的一幕， 在SIPG和重庆之间的最后一刻，史可抢了一下，冯金在禁区摔亚博棋牌娱乐倒了。裁判李海欣与视频裁判张磊通讯后，确定没有犯规或处罚。 通过慢动作，应根据施可的踢球来判罚。人们通常都知道，从后面踢球通常是犯规的，但冯进并没有完全控制住球。当史可从后方伸出脚时，冯金已经将左脚伸出至球的前方，并可能准备将球拉到身后。 这时，球露出了身体的控制范围，而史可此时也从后面抢断。 许多人说这又是张磊，而SIPG的VAR实际上打击了现场。实际上，我个人认为如果这个球不罚球就不是大问题。